Welcome to the Rudloe and environs website.

 

Here you will find news, articles and photos of an area that straddles the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in north-west Wiltshire.

 

Contributions in the form of articles or photos are welcome. Even those with completely contrary views to mine!

 

Thanks to the website builder 1&1 and Rob Brown for the original idea.

 

Rudloescene now, in January 2014, has a sister, academic rather than anarchic, website about Box history here: http://www.boxpeopleandplaces.co.uk/

It contains thoroughly professional, well-researched articles about Box and its people.

 

Contact rudloescene through the 'Contact' page.

rudloescene
rudloescene

Quarry Wood in late autumn.

Please note that this is the 'general' local news page. News for specific areas can be found in the sub-menus - Rudloe, Wadswick, Boxfields, Box, Pickwick, Potley, Corsham, Hawthorn and Westwells/Neston. Wider news may be found under Beyond - Environment and Beyond - Politics

10th March 2017 - over three hundred pied wagtails were roosting in the London plane tree in the new Southgate square in Bath on Tuesday 7th March. Whilst a bit of an 'isolated' tree (there is only one) the square is protected from winds and weathers on all sides so, presumably, this is why it was chosen as a roosting site. I would imagine that roosting here might continue for some days so we will go down towards dusk this evening to see if we can catch them coming in again (and we did ... and they did).

Our Friday, 10th March, visit to Southgate reminded us that this is no longer a public space but is owned by Aviva Investors and British Land as is Brunel Square with its Vaults Restaurant Quarter on the site of the former station car park. The reminder was that as we were waiting for the pied wagtails, we noticed a number of security staff patrolling the area, one of whom was the daughter of an old acquaintance.

 

Such streets are no longer in the public domain but are the subject of 'public realm agreements' between councils and developers. So while the public is winning new rights of access in the countryside, these rights are being taken away in towns and cities. The same thing has happened in Corsham with the Martingate Precinct which is privately owned by Bill Hall's company Martingate Centre (which also owns Newlands Road car park).

The photo above is of the roosting wagtails on Friday, 10th March, at around 5:45 pm. The photo below is of a roost of silly girls who were constantly trying to scare the wagtails away by clapping their hands.

5th September 2016 - after two-and-a-half years, the poster of stylised trees in Walcot Street is being augmented with 'cartoon' cyclists to celebrate stage five of the Tour of Britain ending in Bath on 8th September. The original poster was supposed to be in place for just two weeks but it is still there after thirty months.

In the picture above, the artist's dog sits under the unfinished poster and in the image below, in order to get a perspective on his piece de resistance, the artist views the work from the other side of the street.

2nd August 2016 - as rudloescene's first competition (also dated 2nd August 2016) was, incredibly, won within about ten minutes of it going online, here's another one. Where is this house with painted 'windows' (a trompe l'oeil) which were presumably blocked at the time of the window tax? Another bottle of wine offered to the first person to pinpoint its location.

 

4th January 2017 - it seems that we went from the sublime to the ridiculous (too easy to too difficult) with this quiz as five months on, the silence is deafening and another bottle of wine has gone begging (maybe no one looks at this website). Any road up, this house is in Bloomfield Road, Bath (beyond Bear Flat towards Odd Down).

4th March 2016 - First Bus to scrap the 231 Bath-Rudloe-Corsham-Chippenham service from 24th April

First Bus proposes to scrap this important Bath-Rudloe-Corsham-Chippenham service which has been 'streamlined' in recent months (and purely by the way, for no discernable reason the sycamore to the right of the bus has been reduced to a stump)

Below, the reader will find an email sent to James Gray, our North Wiltshire MP, last night (3rd March 2016) regarding the First Bus proposal to scrap the 231 service. I have also copied the email and requested responses from the First Bus CEO Tim O'Toole and MD Giles Fearnley and Wiltshire Council.  And below that there are three emails to the First Bus CEO and MD (amongst others) dated 13th December 2014, 12th December 2015 and 14th December 2015 about the complete unreliability of the 231 service. I make the point that, given its unreliability, it is hardly surprising that customers have preferred the reliable competitor, Faresaver. Not mentioned in the last night's email is the fact that in recent months, First Bus has elected to 'streamline' its service by avoiding Pewsham and Batheaston - this may have had some effect on its income from this service.

 

 

Dear James,

 
An article from today's (3rd March) Bath Chronicle follows:
 

"The 231 service operated by First West of England, will be scrapped on Sunday, April 24. First Bus chiefs say not enough people are using the service to cover the cost of running the buses, due to competition from other similar bus routes and the faster train option to Chippenham."

With Wiltshire Council's bus service consultation running until 4th April, this proposal is preposterous.

An email exchange between myself and FirstBus is shown below in which I complain about the unreliability of FirstBus services through 2014 and 2015. All FirstBus buses almost invariably ran at least 15 minutes late; some never turned up at all. By contrast, the other (more expensive I might add) service running this route, the Faresaver X31, as I indicate in my emails of 13th December 2014 and 12th December 2015, almost invariably ran to time. Any wonder then that passengers have been lost to the competitor!

And FirstBus's answer to the problem? Not to improve the punctuality. Not to look at the frequency of the service with a view to perhaps reducing it from half-hourly to hourly. No, it is to scrap it!

With up to 3,500 new homes in Chippenham and up to 1,000 in Corsham in the planning pipeline, no park and ride service from the east of Bath and rush-hour buses with not even any standing room (see next para.) this illustrates a complete lack of awareness of the transport requirements of the people of north-west Wiltshire both on a day-to-day basis and in the long run. Where is the strategic thinking, consultation and coordination with regard to Wiltshire/Bath transport matters?

Today, I arrived at the Guildhall bus stop at 16:45 for a bus to Rudloe. The 231 actually arrived on-time at 16:53 but it was so packed I decided to wait for the 17:12 Faresaver X31 which was also close to capacity. I had to stand as far as Batheaston when a few seats became available. It's the same story every day not just on the 16:53 service but others too. And this is the underused service that FirstBus wishes to terminate!

Also, unless a lot of furtive business is being done behind the scenes, how would Wiltshire Council propose that Rudloe, Corsham and Chippenham be served by public transport at evenings and weekends (Sundays) when the Faresaver X31 service does not run? I can only imagine that FirstBus is pushing its own agenda in an attempt to perhaps coerce Wiltshire Council into providing more subsidy. However, as someone once said: this is no way to run a railroad!

Whilst this email is addressed to my MP, James Gray, I would also appreciate responses from the principals in this matter, FirstBus and Wiltshire Council.

Sincerely

Paul Turner

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: wirepuller@hotmail.com

To: giles.fearnley@firstgroup.com; contactwestofengland@firstgroup.com; tim.o'toole@firstgroup.com
Subject: First Bus unreliability
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:42:14 +0000
 
Dear FirstBus,
 
Further confirmation of your unreliable service came yesterday, Sunday 13th December, with the supposed 13:25 service from Leafy Lane ... on a quiet Sunday this turned up at 13:39, fourteen minutes late.
 
On enquiring (!) about this dreadful service at Bath Bus Station, a member of staff told me that the First timetables are unrealistic - the drivers cannot keep to them. This is certainly borne out by the evidence.
 
How many years has First been running buses? A rhetorical question of course ... you have had thirty years in which to hone your expertise and after all this time you are running a completely unreliable service (certainly in the case of the 231).
 
Sincerely
 
Paul Turner
 

From: wirepuller@hotmail.com
To: giles.fearnley@firstgroup.com
CC: contactwestofengland@firstgroup.com
Subject: First Bus unreliability
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:08:44 +0000
 
Dear FirstBus,
 
One year on and nothing has changed. In spite of the 'streamlining' of your 231 route with the avoidance of Batheaston and Pewsham, your buses continue to be completely unreliable. They are almost invariably about twenty minutes late, even the early-morning services. The 'control' mechanism, the Faresaver X31 service which runs the same route, is almost invariably on time.
 
Sincerely
 
Paul Turner
 

Subject: Re: First Bus unreliability
From: Giles.Fearnley@FirstGroup.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:08:09 +0000
To: wirepuller@hotmail.com; contactwestofengland@FirstGroup.com; contactwestofengland@FirstGroup.com

Dear Mr Turner
I do apologise sincerely for the problems you have had with our services. I am grateful you copied me directly into your email.
A detailed response will be sent to you but in the meantime I do want to ensure you that we take any failings very seriously and I can understand how particularly disappointing it was for you and your family to miss the Carol Concert
Yours sincerely
Giles Fearnley

 
  From: Paul Turner [wirepuller@hotmail.com]
  Sent: 13/12/2014 19:41 GMT
  To: Giles Fearnley; contact westofengland; bath csc
  Subject: First Bus unreliability


 
Dear FirstBus,
 
You may be wondering (but probably not) why I am sending you a picture, at 19:20, of our tickets for the carol concert at Bath Abbey tonight (13th December 2014) , instead of actually being there. The reason, of course, is that the 231 service, scheduled to be at Rudloe Estate at 18:20 (see timetable below), failed to turn up. We arrived at the stop at 18:15 and left at 18:35 not knowing (because of your unreliability) whether the bus had passed the stop early or was late (too late for the concert).
 
 
Service No.: 231 231 231 231 231  
Notes:       £ £  
Pewsham Estate, Shops 1730 1805 1907 2004 2143  
Chippenham, Bus Station [8] arr 1738 1813 1915 2012 2151  
Chippenham, Bus Station [8] dep 1743 1819 1917 2014 2153  
Chippenham, Railway Station 1750 1826 1922 2019 2158  
Cepen Park South (Sainsburys) 1803 1839 1934 2031 2210  
Corsham, Newlands Road 1812 1848 1942 2039 2218  
Rudloe, The Estate 1820 1856 1950 2047 2226  
Box, Post Office 1827 1903 1956 2053 2232  
Ashley, The Northey 1830 1906 1959 2056 2235  
Bannerdown Road 1837 1912 2005 2102 2241  
Snow Hill 1846 1919 2012 2109 2248  
Bath, Bus Station [6] 1855 1926 2019 2116 2255  
This is just the latest in a series of early or late 231 events. I regularly catch the weekday 09:17 from Rudloe Estate towards Bath which invariably fails to turn up on time - it is usually about ten minutes late. How this service could accumulate such late minutes so early in the morning is beyond me - or is the schedule not possible to keep to?
 
Last week I went for the Wednesday 11:21 which I saw sailing past the stop at about 11:15!
 
Compared with your competitor, Faresaver, your 231 service is just so unreliable. Getting back to the immediate issue of the lack of the 18:20 service tonight, we have missed an important (to us!) carol service thanks to First. 
 
Sincerely
 
Paul Turner
 

14th October 2015 - Community Governance Review meeting at Corsham Community Campus

 

This meeting of the Working Group on Parish & Community Governance Reviews was arranged in order to take views on the proposals for the Corsham and Box parishes. The meeting agenda, which includes 'frequently asked questions' and a three-page survey can be found in the pdf file at the foot of this article (note that there is no 'Page 2' which was blank).

 

Scores of people (probably a couple of hundred) attended the meeting, principally Box and Rudloe residents, and many good points were made for keeping the status quo. The impression was that if any proposal were to be accepted, it would be the 'counter' proposal from Box Parish Council (agenda item 3b) for the part of Rudloe Estate which is presently in Corsham Parish to be moved to Box Parish.

To the shame of both councils (Corsham and Box) support was given for proposed speculative development on this pastureland at Rudloe when there are more than enough brownfield sites to satisfy housing demand

As the photo indicates, when it comes to throwing Rudloe to the development wolves both parish councils are happy to do so without any thought for the problems that existing householders have. There are no services at Rudloe - the only shop, on Rudloe Estate, closes this month. Do the councils not appreciate that a substantial amount of money is foregone on bus or taxi fares in order simply to get to shops? Parts of Rudloe have been described by Wiltshire Council as "deprived". So where better to put another 88 homes than in a deprived area without services?

 

Corsham Town Council (CTC) Planning Committee voted "unanimously" to support the 88-home development at Rudloe and, interestingly, voted unanimously against the 150-home proposal at Pickwick. This, I believe, indicates CTC's true view of Rudloe - that they care little for the community. At tonight's meeting, the only arguments we heard from CTC were about "new" residents (of new developments) and what community they would wish to be part of (we heard nothing about how they support or propose to support existing residents) and the boundary anomalies (however, CTC's proposal would simply replace one set of anomalies with another - see next para). The author of the Corsham proposal, the former Town Clerk, now CEO, was conspicuous in his silence.

 

So, no good rationale was offered by CTC for their proposal. Even their proposed boundary which was to be based "on fixed features which are likely to remain in place for many years" has been arbitrarily modified to follow a new access road to Wadswick Green which divides Manor Farm's holdings (so part of Manor Farm would be in Box, another part in Corsham).The poor showing from CTC indicates that there really is no solid foundation to their plan.

 

Returning to sporting analogies, as made in my piece in the 7th October article, if this was a boxing match, Box won by a KO in round 1 or if a tennis match, by a WO (walkover).

 

With regard to the meeting agenda below, the included survey is a bit of a minefield as, for example, question 7 says "How far do you agree or disagree thet the proposed changes to the parish boundaries where you live will improve the following factors". But what proposed changes? Those proposed by Corsham or those proposed by Box? The only solution is not to insert any ticks in boxes but to provide a narrative answer. Surveys should be returned either to the email or postal address given on 'Page 8' of the survey by 30th October.

Wiltshire Council Community Governance R[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [580.7 KB]

7th October 2015 - Public Consultation Meeting on Corsham and Box Boundary Review

 

A public consultation meeting regarding the Wiltshire Council Community Governance Review and the proposals from Corsham Town Council to change the Corsham and Box parishes boundary will take place at Corsham Community Campus on Wednesday 14th October 2015 at 7pm.

 

Corsham Town Council's proposals may be found in the .pdf document below. Box Parish Council's responses to the proposals are to be found in the Word (.doc) document below.

 

A thoughtful piece on the proposed changes from Alan Payne of Box People and Places can be found using the 'button' below. Note that the area proposed to be annexed and highlighted in yellow in Alan's article has now been changed (by Corsham Town Council) and no longer includes Chapel Plaister and Wadswick.

 

Locals' views on the proposed change may also be found at the Box People and Places website through the further 'button' below.

 

And I have put in my fivepenny-worth in the third file below.

Corsham Town Council parish boundary pro[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [345.6 KB]
Box Parish Council's response to Corsham[...]
Microsoft Word document [18.3 KB]
Response to Corsham's proposed annexatio[...]
Microsoft Word document [15.6 KB]

27th September - some pictures of the supermoon and lunar eclipse taken with a hand-held, compact camera using standard settings.

Let's call this an impressionist image! Compared with professional photos, such as Matt Cardy's picture (Times front page) taken on the same night at Glastonbury, this is hopeless. But this was taken with a compact camera just using 'standard' settings
Again, technically a hopeless image but this gives an impression of the Earth's shadow creeping across the moon and the resulting 'blood moon'
The Earth's shadow creeps a little further across the face of the moon
Getting towards the full eclipse and 'blood moon' now
Almost there

15th August 2015 - news for nerds

 

There follows a gallery of photos taken along the main railway line between Chippenham and Bath before and during the engineering works preparing the infrastructure for electrification. The line closed on 18th July; work is scheduled for completion by 31st August.

 

Interesting how, like our motor industry before it, our railway industry has now been appropriated by foreign companies. The fine (in their day) Intercity 125 HSTs, designed and built by British Railways Engineering at Derby and Crewe will, after 40-odd years sterling service, be replaced by Japanese trains. The goods (ballast) trains running up and down the lines during electrification infrastructure work are German- and French-owned (DB Schenker and Colas) - the engines are American, built in Canada. The principal infrastructure contractor is Hochtief (German).

 

Governments of all shades, since the war, have sold Britain down the river. This is typified by what has happened to our railway and its engineering prowess.

20th March 2015 - 'the end of the world' as seen from Rudloe (a solar eclipse, super 'new' moon and spring equinox together). Strangely, a crescent-shaped shadow appears at the bottom-right of all these photos - it was not seen in photos taken before or after the eclipse shots.

Here's some up-to-date news - a House of Commons report on litter and fly-tipping published on 14th March 2015 and reported by rudloescene on 16th March 2015. The full text of the report may be found here:

Further links to report documents may be found through this www.parliament.co.uk committees webpage:

However, the report doesn't appear to tell us anything we didn't know already - in my cynical opinion this is just a worthless, bureaucratic exercise. If I'm still around in 12-years time, I have no doubt that the litter problem will be much worse than it is today.

 
It's at this time of year that the roadside litter is exposed in all its glory and our countryside is an absolute disgrace. On my regular bus rides into Bath, that fine Roman/Georgian world heritage city, the roadsides on the outskirts are awash with litter, much of it on the verges outside houses. If I lived in one of these homes, I would be ashamed of the state of the place but people just don't seem to care.
 
Look at the example below of an enormous fly-tip in White Ennox Lane in May 2013. As you may see in the email (shown below the photos) I sent to Wilts County Council, the police and others, there appeared to be quite a bit of potential evidence regarding the person(s) responsible. We're very good in this country at huffing and puffing and forming committees and making reports but when it actually comes to taking action, we're absolutely hopeless.
 
For futher information on what's been happening on the local litter front (since 1979!) see The Rudloe Mob Litteraction webpage here The Rudloe Mob and also see the 'Litter' section of this website here Litter.

Dear Terry,

 
I believe that you have been contacted already (on Thursday, by Mike Canham) about the enormous fly-tip in White Ennox Lane, Boxfields. I visited the site today and took the attached photos. You will need a large truck and quite a bit of labour to shift that lot!
 
I (and others in Rudloe) have reported quite a number of fly-tips (to Mr Sartain, Mrs Larcombe and Barry Reed) over the years and was disappointed that on the last occasion, when your Enforcement (I believe) department became involved and much evidence was available, no action (prosecution) was taken. This was in spite of the evidence containing addresses (work and home), credit card receipts and phone numbers. Quite some time was spent, chez moi, by your enforcement officer, bagging each piece of evidence and taking a statement.
 
With regard to the current fly-tip, my son first saw it on Wednesday morning (15th May) so it looks like it may have occurred overnight on Tuesday/Wednesday (or perhaps earlier). I just had a superficial rummage through the pile this morning and, I would say, it appears to contain quite a bit of 'evidence'. The photos show:
 
  • General views of the size and character of the tip
  • A Southern Electric issue coat (looks pretty new and in good condition)
  • A box for Sky Broadband equipment with serial numbers etc
  • A piece of Sky Broadband equipment
  • A close-up showing many Celtic Football Club programmes/magazines
  • Distinctive girl's clothing
 
The photos were taken over just a 5-minute period. Presumably a deeper examination would unearth much more.
 
Could Wilts CC please take some time to collect evidence with a view to taking enforcement action (and then remove the fly-tip!).
 
You will appreciate that I know your contact details 'from old' but I could find no further relevant email addresses within the Wilts CC website (all my old contacts have moved on) or the Avon and Somerset Police website (I know one Wilts Police address, again 'from old'). I have therefore addressed this to people that I could find; these are the CEO of Wilts CC and the Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Police.
 
Yours sincerely
 
Paul Turner

12th September 2014 - The Tour of Britain comes to Bradford-on-Avon

21st July 2014 - Vulcan bomber over By Brook Valley

 

Oh we of little faith. We were informed by 'a correspondent' that the Vulcan would be coming over at 1:50pm on Monday afternoon so we dutifully went to the top of Box Hill and waited. We gave up at 2:20pm and returned home only to catch sight of it doing a turn and passing over the very spot we had just left.

Proposed annexation of Box Parish by Corsham

16th June 2014 - proposed parish boundary change

 

The map readers out there will see that the proposed new boundary is defined (north to south and west) by Leafy Lane, the B3109 (Bradford Road) to Fiveways, the A365 to its junction with The Wansdyke and thence a short stretch of The Wansdyke to then join with the existing boundary in Neston Park.

 

The proposed annexation takes in, inter alia: Rudloe, including the approved Hannick development of 88 homes and commercial premises; Fiveways Trading Estate; the former RAF Rudloe No 2 Site where a planning application for 170 homes is proposed by year-end and Thorneypits, Chapel Plaister and Wadswick including Manor Farm.

 

The following is a response from the Corsham Town Clerk to my email on the subject. The 'Community Governance Review' paper attached to the Town Clerk's email follows the extract.

 

Regarding the Community Governance Review (Boundary Review) this was dealt with at the Council (Planning) meeting on 2 April 2014 (Minute PL 125/13) see: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728031/Planning/Minutes/Planning%20Minutes%202%20April%202014%20DM.pdf. Wiltshire Council invited all local councils in Wiltshire to put forward suggestions for reviews earlier this year. The Town Council had been considering the issue for some time prior to that and it features in our Strategic Plan 2014-2018 – see: http://www.corsham.gov.uk/information/Resources/Strategic%20Plan%202014%20-%20approved%20-%20one%20document.pdf. We will be submitting our rationale and justifications during Wiltshire Council’s formal consultation period.

Community Governance Review (June 2014) [...]
Adobe Acrobat document [236.2 KB]
The last outward sign of The Bear at Box

24th May 2014 - The Bear at Box

 

The photo was taken on Wednesday 21st May in the last days of any outward signs of The Bear as a pub. By Saturday, it was open for business as The Bengal Bear with "the finest Bangladeshi and Indian cuisine".

 

With the demise, over the years, of The Legion, The Chequers and now The Bear, Box village has just one watering hole remaining - The Queens Head.

 

The more adventurous (and mobile) could try The Northey (a tad dear), The Quarryman's (a long uphill hike), The Swan (an even longer hike) or perhaps The Rudloe Arms (idiosyncratic to say the least with a fairly paltry choice of alcoholic beverages but the garden on a summer's evening (25th July) is delightful).

22nd January 2014 - accident in Bilbury Lane, Bath

 

This accident occurred at around midday when a truck-mounted crane shifting a generator toppled over onto the flat-roofed extension of The Lamb and Lion pub. 

6th January 2014 - flooding at Batheaston

 

Certainly nowhere near as bad as the Christmas Eve flooding but the meadows are awash with 'new' floodwater now after more heavy rain. Many of the photos show piles of trunks and branches from the trees, in the substantial patch of land adjacent to the car sales pitch, that were cut down in autumn 2013.

 

The supposed reason for the felling, according to the Environment Agency, was to guard against trees, or tree parts, falling into the river and fouling the weir downstream. However, I would have thought that all the pictured tree parts were in far greater danger of being washed downstream than well-rooted trees.

Each axle had 8 wheels and with 7 axles front and rear that's 112 wheels - that's some low-loader!

27th October 2013 - transformer en-route from Avonmouth to Melksham

 

The biggest load to pass through Wiltshire - a 254-tonne transformer on a 112-wheel low-loader with tractor units front and rear passes through Rudloe at 1pm today. The associated convoy even had a tree surgery team. The route was designed to avoid the railway bridge at Melksham that would not have been able to cope with the weight so the Wiltshire leg was A350 to Chippenham, A4 to Corsham/Pickwick, B3109 to Fiveways, A365 to Shaw, B3353 through Shaw then Westlands Land to the sub-station.

 

I guess that for the A365/B3353 junction at Shaw, the low-loader would have to proceed past the junction, the tractor units detach, turn around and re-attach to face the opposite way in order to negotiate the acute bend. If anyone knows what actually happened, please send answers on a postcard to .....

20th September 2013 - information from Hannick Homes

 

See the 'News', 'Rudloe' pages for the latest information on the proposed development.

June/July 2013

 

In Pickwick and Rudloe, proposed housing and commercial developments on greenfield sites are causing local people much heartache and concern. The proposed Pickwick site, illustrated in the background photo of the Pickwick page, is the field on the A4 opposite St Patrick's church. The AGM of the Pickwick Association held at the Hare & Hounds on 24th June attracted more than 100 people, most of whom attended to find out what was happening over this development.

 

With so many brownfield sites (Copenacre, RAF Rudloe No 1 and 2 sites, HMS Royal Arthur, Rudloe Estate (density increase), the former Leafield Engineering explosives factory at Westwells, the Flamingo Club) available for development, local people cannot understand why greenfield development could be proposed.

 

The planning process appears, to the layman, to be a shambles. There is a plethora of documents (the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), the Housing Land Supply Strategy or Statement (HLSS), the Core Strategy, the Local Plan and many others) which must have taken an age to produce and describe a situation whereby any development should firstly take place on brownfield sites.

 

It is difficult to glean the correct position with regard to the strategic housing requirement. A stand at the Hannick Homes exhibition on 22 June stated that the wider Corsham area needed to provide 475 homes by 2026 (this is the Core Strategy figure for Corsham Town). The brownfield sites in the Rudloe/Westwells area alone can provide in excess of this figure over the coming years so why propose developments on greenfield sites?

  

A national campaign was started on 29 June addressed to Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary and Nick Boles, the Planning Under Secretary to stop speculative developers taking advantage of loose or undeveloped planning strategies at local level. The campaign webpage can be found here:

 

 http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/uk-s-department-of-communities-and-local-government-stop-speculative-developers-blighting-communities-up-and-down-the-country

 

Please help this campaign by signing the petition.

 

A couple of years on now (writing in July 2015) and the hoped for support for the petition seems wildly optimistic. Just 81 people signed, due largely to the author's principle of eschewing social media, 'likes', 'everybody's talking about', crowdsourcing and so on.

 

Thanks for the genuine support from the eighty-one.

 

My inordinately long email dated 25th June 2013 objecting to the proposed developments
The email concentrates on the greenfield/brownfield issue. Please note that the RAF Rudloe No 1 and 2 sites referred to in the email are the wrong way around - for no. 1 read no. 2 etc.
Inordinately long email objecting to dev[...]
Microsoft Word document [21.6 KB]
Print Print | Sitemap
© Paul Turner